On Tue 25-10-16 14:41:42, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Btrfs has no bounds except memory on the amount of dirty memory that we have
> in
> use for metadata. Historically we have used a special inode so we could take
> advantage of the balance_dirty_pages throttling that comes with using
> pagecache.
>
Hello, Josef.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:20:16AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > @@ -3701,7 +3703,20 @@ static unsigned long
> > > node_pagecache_reclaimable(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> > > if (unlikely(delta > nr_pagecache_reclaimable))
> > > delta = nr_pagecache_reclaimable;
> > >
On 10/25/2016 03:50 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:41:42PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Btrfs has no bounds except memory on the amount of dirty memory that we have in
use for metadata. Historically we have used a special inode so we could take
advantage of the
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:41:42PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Btrfs has no bounds except memory on the amount of dirty memory that we have
> in
> use for metadata. Historically we have used a special inode so we could take
> advantage of the balance_dirty_pages throttling that comes
Btrfs has no bounds except memory on the amount of dirty memory that we have in
use for metadata. Historically we have used a special inode so we could take
advantage of the balance_dirty_pages throttling that comes with using pagecache.
However as we'd like to support different blocksizes it
