On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:58:07AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument.
Why is it obsolete, it looks like it's being used to me? Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On 09/14/2012 08:45 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:58:07AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument.
Why is it obsolete, it looks like it's being used to me? Thanks,
All of its callers use 0 as nocow_only now.
thanks,
liubo
Josef
--
To
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:55:23AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
On 09/14/2012 08:45 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:58:07AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument.
Why is it obsolete, it looks like it's being used to me? Thanks,
All of its callers
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:45:16AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:58:07AM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument.
Why is it obsolete, it looks like it's being used to me? Thanks,
It's always 0 so the removed code never executes.
I'm tracking
