Re: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED

2014-02-24 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:44:14PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > - return d_obtain_alias(inode); > > + return d_obtain_alias_root(inode); > > Can we call this d_obtain_root or similar, please? Yes, I like d_obtain_root better, done. I'll send out the updated series sometime. --b

Re: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED

2014-02-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> > - return d_obtain_alias(inode); > + return d_obtain_alias_root(inode); Can we call this d_obtain_root or similar, please? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vg

[PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED

2014-02-18 Thread J. Bruce Fields
From: "J. Bruce Fields" There are a few d_obtain_alias callers that are using it to get the root of a filesystem which may already have an alias somewhere else. This is not the same as the filehandle-lookup case, and none of them actually need DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set. In the btrfs case this was