On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 08:43:36AM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> > You're right, sorry. The file was not added after a conflict with
> > git-am and I did not check afterwards. Local build test passed.
> > Updated integration pushed, though it's a bit reduced. The 'next'
> > sub-branch rebase had s
On 19 June 2014 00:05, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:59:50PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
>> I think you forgot to apply the patch that adds
>> Documentation/btrfs-mount.5.txt before you tagged
>> integration-20140618, man5 (and consequently Documentation) can't be
>> made witho
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:59:50PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> I think you forgot to apply the patch that adds
> Documentation/btrfs-mount.5.txt before you tagged
> integration-20140618, man5 (and consequently Documentation) can't be
> made without it, causing a failed build.
You're right, sorr
On 18 June 2014 16:29, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> > So what if the mount options are generated from btrfs-mount.txt but
>> > installed under btrfs.5.gz name? If there are more section 5 manpages we
>> > can make it more generic but for no
On 6/18/14, 10:29 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> So what if the mount options are generated from btrfs-mount.txt but
>>> installed under btrfs.5.gz name? If there are more section 5 manpages we
>>> can make it more generic but for now har
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > So what if the mount options are generated from btrfs-mount.txt but
> > installed under btrfs.5.gz name? If there are more section 5 manpages we
> > can make it more generic but for now hardcoding btrfs-mount.* ->
> > btrfs.5. sounds
On 6/12/14, 5:51 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:14:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> This is a straight cut and paste from the util-linux
>> mount manpage into btrfs-mount.5
>>
>> It's pretty much impossible for util-linux to keep up
>> with every filesystem out there, and Ka
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:14:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> This is a straight cut and paste from the util-linux
> mount manpage into btrfs-mount.5
>
> It's pretty much impossible for util-linux to keep up
> with every filesystem out there, and Karel has more than
> once expressed a wish that
This is a straight cut and paste from the util-linux
mount manpage into btrfs-mount.5
It's pretty much impossible for util-linux to keep up
with every filesystem out there, and Karel has more than
once expressed a wish that mount options move into fs-specific
manpages.
So, here we go.
The way bt