2018年11月22日(木) 16:06 Al Viro :
>
> Can you show me where does POSIX/SuS/whatever it's called these days promise
> that kind of atomicity?
No. I couldn't found it.
That's why I previously posted RFC Patch:
https://marc.info/?t=15423727791&r=1&w=2
I wasn't sure this is a bug in the kernel or not
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:40:50PM +0900, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
> 2018年11月21日(水) 13:54 Al Viro :
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:43:56AM +0900, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
> > > Some file systems (including ext4, xfs, ramfs ...) have the following
> > > problem as I've described in the commit message
2018年11月21日(水) 13:54 Al Viro :
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:43:56AM +0900, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
> > Some file systems (including ext4, xfs, ramfs ...) have the following
> > problem as I've described in the commit message of the 1/4 patch.
> >
> > The commit ef3d0fd27e90 ("vfs: do (nearly) loc
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:43:56AM +0900, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
> Some file systems (including ext4, xfs, ramfs ...) have the following
> problem as I've described in the commit message of the 1/4 patch.
>
> The commit ef3d0fd27e90 ("vfs: do (nearly) lockless generic_file_llseek")
> removed al
Some file systems (including ext4, xfs, ramfs ...) have the following
problem as I've described in the commit message of the 1/4 patch.
The commit ef3d0fd27e90 ("vfs: do (nearly) lockless generic_file_llseek")
removed almost all locks in llseek() including SEEK_END. It based on the
idea that
