At 10/17/2016 10:30 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
This patchset can be fetched from github:
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedupe_20160907
Can you please publish the patchset in a branch that does not change
name and is not
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from github:
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedupe_20160907
Can you please publish the patchset in a branch that does not change
name and is not based on for-next? I'm' going to do less
On 09/10/2016 08:22 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
This patchset can be fetched from github:
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedupe_20160907
This version is just another small update, rebased to David's
for-next-20160906 branch.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from github:
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedupe_20160907
>
> This version is just another small update, rebased to David's
> for-next-20160906 branch.
>
> This updates only includes one
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:12:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from github:
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedupe_20160907
>
> This version is just another small update, rebased to David's
> for-next-20160906 branch.
I've rebased it locally to the 4.9
This patchset can be fetched from github:
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git wang_dedupe_20160907
This version is just another small update, rebased to David's
for-next-20160906 branch.
This updates only includes one small fix, which is exposed by recent
commits which checks
