At Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:47:29 +0900,
Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> Marc reported that "btrfs check --repair" runs much faster than "btrfs
> check", which is quite weird.
>
> This patch will add time elapsed for each major tree it checked, for
> both original mode and lowmem mode, so we can have a clue what
Marc reported that "btrfs check --repair" runs much faster than "btrfs
check", which is quite weird.
This patch will add time elapsed for each major tree it checked, for
both original mode and lowmem mode, so we can have a clue what's going
wrong.
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenru
