On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:07:24PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:26:29AM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> > The tree checker currently rejects unrecognized flags when it reads
> > btrfs_inode_item. Practically, this means that adding a new flag makes
> > the change backwards i
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:26:29AM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> The tree checker currently rejects unrecognized flags when it reads
> btrfs_inode_item. Practically, this means that adding a new flag makes
> the change backwards incompatible if the flag is ever set on a file.
>
> Take up one of the
The tree checker currently rejects unrecognized flags when it reads
btrfs_inode_item. Practically, this means that adding a new flag makes
the change backwards incompatible if the flag is ever set on a file.
Take up one of the 4 reserved u64 fields in the btrfs_inode_item as a
new "compat_flags".
