On 21/02/2019 12:55, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 20.02.19 г. 17:27 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> Hmm "... and num_added" for the Subject?
>
> Nah, that's obvious, the focus here is instead of taking 4-5 more
> arguments they are replaced with async_cow.
>
Fair enough
--
Johannes Thums
On 20.02.19 г. 17:27 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Hmm "... and num_added" for the Subject?
Nah, that's obvious, the focus here is instead of taking 4-5 more
arguments they are replaced with async_cow.
Hmm "... and num_added" for the Subject?
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürn
All context this function needs is held within struct async_cow.
Currently we not only pass the struct but also every individual member.
This is redundant, simplify it by only passing struct async_cow and
leaving it to compress_file_range to extract the values it requires.
No functional changes.
S
