At 06/09/2016 05:15 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:53:00AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:13:03PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
Only in the case of different root_id or different object_id, check_shared
identified extent as the shared. However, If a extent wa
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:53:00AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:13:03PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> > Only in the case of different root_id or different object_id, check_shared
> > identified extent as the shared. However, If a extent was referred by
> > different offset of
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:13:03PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> Only in the case of different root_id or different object_id, check_shared
> identified extent as the shared. However, If a extent was referred by
> different offset of same file, it should also be identified as shared.
> In addition, che
Only in the case of different root_id or different object_id, check_shared
identified extent as the shared. However, If a extent was referred by
different offset of same file, it should also be identified as shared.
In addition, check_shared's loop scale is at least n^3, so if a extent
has too man
