Re: [PATCH v3] fstests: btrfs/159 superblock corruption test case

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 06:43:49AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > > > > +# Test if the superblock corruption is handled correctly: > > > +#- Test fsid miss-match (csum ok) between primary and copy > > > superblock > > > +#Fixed by the ML patch: > > > +#btrfs: check if the

Re: [PATCH v3] fstests: btrfs/159 superblock corruption test case

+# Test if the superblock corruption is handled correctly: +# - Test fsid miss-match (csum ok) between primary and copy superblock +# Fixed by the ML patch: +# btrfs: check if the fsid in the primary sb and copy sb are same +# - Test if the mount fails if the primary

Re: [PATCH v3] fstests: btrfs/159 superblock corruption test case

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:28:30PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Verify if the superblock corruption is handled correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain > --- > v2->v3: > Provide the disk to be corrupted as an arg, instead of swapping the devices, > so drop

[PATCH v3] fstests: btrfs/159 superblock corruption test case

Verify if the superblock corruption is handled correctly. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain --- v2->v3: Provide the disk to be corrupted as an arg, instead of swapping the devices, so drop mount_opt_minus_args(). 159.out slightly changed. v1->v2: $subject slightly changed