On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:48:14PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
"some kind of fallback"
> have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should be generally useful to
> have an in-kernel copy to avoid lots of switches between
On 09/28/2015 02:31 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:48:14PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
>> The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
>
> "some kind of fallback"
I'll rephrase that :)
>
>> have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should
On 09/25/2015 08:14 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Anna Schumaker
> wrote:
>> The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
>> have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should be generally useful to
>> have an
The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should be generally useful to
have an in-kernel copy to avoid lots of switches between kernel and user
space.
I make this configurable by adding two new flags. Users who only want
On 25/09/15 21:48, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
> have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should be generally useful to
> have an in-kernel copy to avoid lots of switches between kernel and user
> space.
>
> I make this
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Anna Schumaker
wrote:
> The NFS server will need some kind offallback for filesystems that don't
> have any kind of copy acceleration, and it should be generally useful to
> have an in-kernel copy to avoid lots of switches between kernel