On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:02:38AM +0800, Gui Hecheng wrote:
> I note that this patch is not yet in the latest integration, how's the
> fix going?
The patch was still buggy, a fix will land in 3.18.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:32 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> > This hasn't landed in an btrfs-progs branch I found. Any update?
>
> I had it tagged for review and found something that needs fixing. The
> PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is hardcoded to 4
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> This hasn't landed in an btrfs-progs branch I found. Any update?
I had it tagged for review and found something that needs fixing. The
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is hardcoded to 4k, this will break on filesystems with
larger sectors (eg. the po
This hasn't landed in an btrfs-progs branch I found. Any update?
Marc
Am Dienstag, 23. September 2014, 16:34:54 schrieb Gui Hecheng:
> When runing restore under lzo compression, "bad compress length"
> problems are encountered.
> It is because there is a page align problem with the @decompress_lz
When runing restore under lzo compression, "bad compress length"
problems are encountered.
It is because there is a page align problem with the @decompress_lzo,
as follows:
|--| ||-| |--|...|--|
page ^page page
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 10:25 +0800, Gui Hecheng wrote:
> When runing restore under lzo compression, "bad compress length"
> problems are encountered.
> It is because there is a page align problem with the @decompress_lzo,
> as follows:
> |--| ||-| |--|...|--|
>
When runing restore under lzo compression, "bad compress length"
problems are encountered.
It is because there is a page align problem with the @decompress_lzo,
as follows:
|--| ||-| |--|...|--|
page ^page page