Re: [PATCHv2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

2015-10-29 Thread Josef Bacik
On 10/29/2015 04:22 AM, Luke Dashjr wrote: 32-bit ioctl uses these rather than the regular FS_IOC_* versions. They can be handled in btrfs using the same code. Without this, 32-bit {ch,ls}attr fail. Looks good, thanks, Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCHv2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

2015-10-29 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 08:22:21AM +, Luke Dashjr wrote: > 32-bit ioctl uses these rather than the regular FS_IOC_* versions. They can > be handled in btrfs using the same code. Without this, 32-bit {ch,ls}attr > fail. > > Signed-off-by: Luke Dashjr > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by:

[PATCHv2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

2015-10-29 Thread Luke Dashjr
32-bit ioctl uses these rather than the regular FS_IOC_* versions. They can be handled in btrfs using the same code. Without this, 32-bit {ch,ls}attr fail. Signed-off-by: Luke Dashjr Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 + fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/bt