On 06/10/2015 06:13 PM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Hi,
Can this patch please be considered for upstream inclusion? I reviewed
it myself and have tested it on a few files with an updated duperemove
branch:
https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove/tree/alignment_fix
as described below, this
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:18:25PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi Mark,
This one conflicts with your btrfs: Handle unaligned length in
extent_same, which is in integration now. If we need both, can you
please rework it?
They both fix the same bug, so we just need one of them. You can keep
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:13:55PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Hi,
Can this patch please be considered for upstream inclusion? I reviewed
it myself and have tested it on a few files with an updated duperemove
branch:
https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove/tree/alignment_fix
as
Hi,
Can this patch please be considered for upstream inclusion? I reviewed
it myself and have tested it on a few files with an updated duperemove
branch:
https://github.com/markfasheh/duperemove/tree/alignment_fix
as described below, this allows us to dedupe the tail extents of files
whose size