On 12/16/2014 04:23 AM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Hi Goffredo,
[...]
>
> It removes "Incompat" from original message. I consider
> "Backward Incompatible Feature" is better. I consider,
> the word, "incompatible", is very important for users.
Right, another good catch.
>
> In addition, original v
I forgoto to put in CC the mailing list
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [RFC][BTRFS-PROGS] Improve output of mkfs.btrfs command
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:57:25 +0100
From: Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply-To: kreij...@inwind.it
To: Holger Hoffstätte
On 12/17/2014 04:08 PM, Holger
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:02:53 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> enclosed a patches set to improve the output of mkfs.btrfs command.
This is very nice! I do have a comment about the device list:
> ..
> UUID IDSIZEPATH
> ---
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:02:53PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> enclosed a patches set to improve the output of mkfs.btrfs command.
>
> Currently I find the output of mkfs.btrfs command quite confusing:
Thanks. I've marked the wiki://Project_ideas item as claimed.
> After my patches the ou
Hi Goffredo,
(2014/12/16 5:02), Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> enclosed a patches set to improve the output of mkfs.btrfs command.
The idea looks nice to me. I have some comments about
new output.
Thanks,
Satoru
>
> Currently I find the output of mkfs.btrfs command quite confu
Hi All,
enclosed a patches set to improve the output of mkfs.btrfs command.
Currently I find the output of mkfs.btrfs command quite confusing:
# mkfs.btrfs -f -M -d raid5 -m raid5 /dev/vd[b-k]
Btrfs v3.17
See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information.
Turning ON incompat feature 'mi
