On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:01:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
The other suggestion I received is to ship a systemd unit that does
unconditional btrfs scan pre local filesystem target... =)
While this works (as any ohter user script/hook that preceeds local
filesystem mount), I'd rather
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 01:43:35PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
I have the following reasons to support a mount.btrfs helper:
1) it is in a good point to check that everything is ok (see the
thread
related LVM snapshot, due to a dev.uuid conflicts),
2) it is in a good point to issue a good
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:51:51PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
From there if we really need a mount helper, it can either use a
libbtrfs to hit the scan code or be a bash script.
Thanks for trying to smooth our or wrinkles in this area. It's
definitely worth working on, I just
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
wrote:
On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
anything that would be missed there.
I'm sorry, udev rule(s) is not sufficient in the
On 5 December 2014 at 15:32, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
wrote:
On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
anything that would be
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 04:01:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 5 December 2014 at 15:32, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
wrote:
On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
In ubuntu, the
On 12/05/2014 05:41 PM, David Sterba wrote:
We're looking
for good reasons to justify the existence of the helper, but this is
still not enough IMHO. I can see the convenience to do it automatically,
but this assumes no udev available which is probably rare these days.
I have the following
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
kreij...@inwind.it wrote:
On 12/05/2014 05:41 PM, David Sterba wrote:
We're looking
for good reasons to justify the existence of the helper, but this is
still not enough IMHO. I can see the convenience to do it
automatically,
but this
Hi Chris,
On 12/05/2014 07:43 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
kreij...@inwind.it wrote:
On 12/05/2014 05:41 PM, David Sterba wrote:
We're looking for good reasons to justify the existence of the
helper, but this is still not enough IMHO. I can
On 12/04/2014 03:09 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
On 01/12/2014 01:43, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi all,
this patch provides a mount.btrfs helper for the mount command. A
btrfs filesystem could span several disks. This helper scans all
the partitions to discover all the disks required to mount
On 05/12/2014 01:58, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 12/04/2014 03:09 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
On 01/12/2014 01:43, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi all,
this patch provides a mount.btrfs helper for the mount command. A
btrfs filesystem could span several disks. This helper scans all
the
On 01/12/2014 01:43, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi all,
this patch provides a mount.btrfs helper for the mount command.
A btrfs filesystem could span several disks. This helper scans all the
partitions to discover all the disks required to mount a filesystem.
So it would not necessary
Hi all,
this patch provides a mount.btrfs helper for the mount command.
A btrfs filesystem could span several disks. This helper scans all the
partitions to discover all the disks required to mount a filesystem.
So it would not necessary any-more to scan the partitions to mount a
filesystem.
Hello,
On 30 November 2014 at 17:43, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it wrote:
Hi all,
this patch provides a mount.btrfs helper for the mount command.
A btrfs filesystem could span several disks. This helper scans all the
partitions to discover all the disks required to mount a
In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
anything that would be missed there.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
On 30 November 2014 at 17:43, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it wrote:
Hi all,
this patch provides a
On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
anything that would be missed there.
I'm sorry, udev rule(s) is not sufficient in the initramfs-less case,
as outlined.
In case of booting with initramfs, indeed,
Sorry, misread initrdless as initramfs.
In #btrfs, I usually say something like do you gain enough by not
using an initfs for this to be worth the hassle?, but of course,
that's not an argument against making mount smarter.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
