2012/3/21 Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Any comments?
No comment, but I'm using this patches without problem since you
published it (compressed
/home with hourly snapshot delete/creation).
Thanks a lot for your work,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 21/03/12 23:34, Andrea Gelmini wrote:
No comment, but I'm using this patches without problem since you
published it (compressed /home with hourly snapshot delete/creation).
Well worth sending a Tested-By: tag then, it's useful information.
cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel :
On 03/22/2012 09:04 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
On 21/03/12 23:34, Andrea Gelmini wrote:
No comment, but I'm using this patches without problem since you
published it (compressed /home with hourly snapshot delete/creation).
Well worth sending a Tested-By: tag then, it's useful information.
Any comments?
On 03/15/2012 05:12 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
This patchset is against one of project ideas, RBtree lock contention:
Btrfs uses a number of rbtrees to index in-memory data structures.
Some of these are dominated by reads, and the lock contention from searching
them is showing up in
This patchset is against one of project ideas, RBtree lock contention:
Btrfs uses a number of rbtrees to index in-memory data structures.
Some of these are dominated by reads, and the lock contention from searching
them is showing up in profiles. We need to look into an RCU and sequence
counter
