David Sterba wrote on 2016/05/23 13:08 +0200:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:33:55AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
We'll enrich the test cases for current low memory mode.
I started something to add optional default options for a few basic
commands (mkfs, fsck, convert) to extend the coverage. I'm not
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:33:55AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> We'll enrich the test cases for current low memory mode.
I started something to add optional default options for a few basic
commands (mkfs, fsck, convert) to extend the coverage. I'm not finished,
the idea is to call the commands via so
David Sterba wrote on 2016/05/19 16:51 +0200:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:58:57AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Josef Bacik wrote on 2016/05/17 11:29 -0400:
On 05/17/2016 05:38 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Thanks for the review.
I'll add it to github branch to avoid unneeded mail bombing.
Thanks. I di
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:58:57AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Josef Bacik wrote on 2016/05/17 11:29 -0400:
> > On 05/17/2016 05:38 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >
> Thanks for the review.
>
> I'll add it to github branch to avoid unneeded mail bombing.
Thanks. I did one more pass and fixed the error mes
Josef Bacik wrote on 2016/05/17 11:29 -0400:
On 05/17/2016 05:38 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
From: Lu Fengqi
You can add
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik
To the whole series. Thanks,
Josef
Thanks for the review.
I'll add it to github branch to avoid unneeded mail bombing.
Thanks
Qu
--
To unsu
On 05/17/2016 05:38 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
From: Lu Fengqi
You can add
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik
To the whole series. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://
From: Lu Fengqi
Introduce a new fsck mode: low memory mode.
Old btrfsck is doing a quite efficient but uses some memory for each
extent item.
Old method will ensure extents are only iterated once at extent/chunk
tree check process.
But since it uses a little memory for each extent item, for lar
