Hi Chris,
On 01/06, Chris Mason wrote:
> Neat. The faila/failb were always my least favorite part of the btrfs
> code ;) Did you test just raid5/6 or also the higher parity counts?
At this stage no real testing was made with btrfs.
The intention of this btrfs patch is mainly to get feedback on
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 10:31 +0100, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote:
> This patch changes btrfs/raid56.c to use the new raid interface and
> extends its support to an arbitrary number of parities.
>
> More in details, the two faila/failb failure indexes are now replaced
> with a fail[] vector that keeps tra
This patch changes btrfs/raid56.c to use the new raid interface and
extends its support to an arbitrary number of parities.
More in details, the two faila/failb failure indexes are now replaced
with a fail[] vector that keeps track of up to six failures, and now
the new raid_par() and raid_rec() f
