On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 06:12:28AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:08:22AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > I think I got all the tests renumbered correctly and fixed all the other
> > bugs.
> > I'd like to send the updated patchpile to Dave tomorrow, but if you have
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:08:22AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> I think I got all the tests renumbered correctly and fixed all the other bugs.
> I'd like to send the updated patchpile to Dave tomorrow, but if you have a few
> spare cycles would you mind giving this a quick test to make sure I fi
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:36:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:34:27AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Bleargh, _require_*_dedupe forgot to check for ENOTTY output, so all the
> > dedupe
> > tests should have _notrun.
> >
> > Also, generic/806 was calling the wr
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:34:27AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Bleargh, _require_*_dedupe forgot to check for ENOTTY output, so all the
> dedupe
> tests should have _notrun.
>
> Also, generic/806 was calling the wrong _require.
>
> I'll start renumbering tests; Christoph, did you see anythin
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:51:15AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:07:56AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Looks fine:
> >
> > Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig
>
> Actually I take this back. I had though this was the existing series
> with my fixes, but this one stil
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 01:07:56AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks fine:
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig
Actually I take this back. I had though this was the existing series
with my fixes, but this one still incorrectly assumes that if reflink
works dedup works as well, leading to lots
Looks fine:
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig
some of the free block range stuff might need minor fixups for certain
file systems later, but I'd rather do this once all the patches are
merged.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord.
Hi all,
This is part of the third revision of an RFC for adding to XFS support
for tracking reverse-mappings of physical blocks to file and metadata;
and support for mapping multiple file logical blocks to the same
physical block, more commonly known as reflinking.
This patchset aims to make xfst
