On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:29:26AM -0800, David Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:30:55AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >Gcc warns that "ret" can be used uninitialized. It can't actually be
> >used uninitialized because btrfs_num_copies() always returns 1 or more.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Dan
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:30:55AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Gcc warns that "ret" can be used uninitialized. It can't actually be
used uninitialized because btrfs_num_copies() always returns 1 or more.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-int
Gcc warns that "ret" can be used uninitialized. It can't actually be
used uninitialized because btrfs_num_copies() always returns 1 or more.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index 064b29b..c053e90 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/check-integ