wait_on_state has no error conditions and should return void. Its callers
already ignore the error code anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <je...@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -621,8 +621,8 @@ search_again:
goto again;
}
-static int wait_on_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
- struct extent_state *state)
+static void wait_on_state(struct extent_io_tree *tree,
+ struct extent_state *state)
__releases(tree->lock)
__acquires(tree->lock)
{
@@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ static int wait_on_state(struct extent_i
schedule();
spin_lock(&tree->lock);
finish_wait(&state->wq, &wait);
- return 0;
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
