On 2015-06-15 19:38, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 15.06.15 19:23, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@inwind.it) wrote:
On 2015-06-15 12:46, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 13.06.15 17:09, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Further, the problem will be more intense in this eg.
On Wed, 17.06.15 21:10, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Well, /bin/mount is not a daemon, and it should not be one.
My helper is not a deamon; you was correct the first time: it blocks
until all needed/enough devices are appeared.
Anyway this should not be different from
В Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:02:02 +0200
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net пишет:
On Wed, 17.06.15 21:10, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Well, /bin/mount is not a daemon, and it should not be one.
My helper is not a deamon; you was correct the first time: it blocks
On Sat, 13.06.15 17:35, Anand Jain (anand.j...@oracle.com) wrote:
Are there any other users?
- If the the device in the argument is already mounted,
can it straightaway return 0 (ready) ? (as of now it would
again independently read the SB determine total_devices
and
On Sat, 13.06.15 17:09, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Further, the problem will be more intense in this eg. if you use dd
and copy device A to device B. After you mount device A, by just
providing device B in the above two commands you could let kernel
update the device
On Mon, 15.06.15 19:23, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@inwind.it) wrote:
On 2015-06-15 12:46, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 13.06.15 17:09, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Further, the problem will be more intense in this eg. if you use dd
and copy device A to device
On 2015-06-15 12:46, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 13.06.15 17:09, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote:
Further, the problem will be more intense in this eg. if you use dd
and copy device A to device B. After you mount device A, by just
providing device B in the above two
On 2015-06-14 06:05, Duncan wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:09:19 +0200 as
excerpted:
My attempt followed a different idea: the mount helper waits the devices
if needed, or if it is the case it mounts the filesystem in degraded
mode.
All devices are passed as mount
В Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:35:53 +0800
Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com пишет:
Thanks for your reply Andrei and Goffredo.
more below...
On 06/13/2015 04:08 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2015-06-12 20:04, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:16:30 +0800
Anand Jain
On 2015-06-13 11:35, Anand Jain wrote:
Thanks for your reply Andrei and Goffredo. more below...
On 06/13/2015 04:08 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2015-06-12 20:04, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:16:30 +0800 Anand Jain
anand.j...@oracle.com пишет:
Thanks for your reply Andrei and Goffredo.
more below...
On 06/13/2015 04:08 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 2015-06-12 20:04, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:16:30 +0800
Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com пишет:
BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY is to check if all the required
On 2015-06-12 20:04, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:16:30 +0800
Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com пишет:
BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY is to check if all the required devices
are known by the btrfs kernel, so that admin/system-application
could mount the FS. It is checked against
В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:16:30 +0800
Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com пишет:
BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY is to check if all the required devices
are known by the btrfs kernel, so that admin/system-application
could mount the FS. It is checked against a device in the argument.
However the
13 matches
Mail list logo