Re: Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-13 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2016-06-10 15:26, Henk Slager wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Brendan Hide wrote: On 06/09/2016 03:07 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2016-06-09 08:34, Brendan Hide wrote: Hey, all I noticed this odd behaviour while migrating from a 1TB spindle to

Re: Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-10 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
On 06/10/2016 09:58 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: On 06/10/2016 09:26 PM, Henk Slager wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Brendan Hide wrote: On 06/09/2016 03:07 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: OK, I'm pretty sure I know what was going on in this case. Your

Re: Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-10 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
On 06/10/2016 09:26 PM, Henk Slager wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Brendan Hide wrote: On 06/09/2016 03:07 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: OK, I'm pretty sure I know what was going on in this case. Your assumption that device delete uses the balance code

Re: Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-10 Thread Henk Slager
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Brendan Hide wrote: > > > On 06/09/2016 03:07 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: >> >> On 2016-06-09 08:34, Brendan Hide wrote: >>> >>> Hey, all >>> >>> I noticed this odd behaviour while migrating from a 1TB spindle to SSD >>> (in this case

Re: Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-09 Thread Brendan Hide
On 06/09/2016 03:07 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2016-06-09 08:34, Brendan Hide wrote: Hey, all I noticed this odd behaviour while migrating from a 1TB spindle to SSD (in this case on a LUKS-encrypted 200GB partition) - and am curious if this behaviour I've noted below is expected or

Re: Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-09 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2016-06-09 08:34, Brendan Hide wrote: Hey, all I noticed this odd behaviour while migrating from a 1TB spindle to SSD (in this case on a LUKS-encrypted 200GB partition) - and am curious if this behaviour I've noted below is expected or known. I figure it is a bug. Depending on the situation,

Allocator behaviour during device delete

2016-06-09 Thread Brendan Hide
Hey, all I noticed this odd behaviour while migrating from a 1TB spindle to SSD (in this case on a LUKS-encrypted 200GB partition) - and am curious if this behaviour I've noted below is expected or known. I figure it is a bug. Depending on the situation, it *could* be severe. In my case it