Hi again,
Having numerous snapshots, I prefer to ask rather than take the risk of
exploding my storage space, better safe than sorry ;-)
man btrfs states :
« NOTE: defragmenting with kernels up to 2.6.37 will unlink COW-ed
copies of data, don't use it if you use snapshots, have
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:46:14PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi again,
Having numerous snapshots, I prefer to ask rather than take the risk of
exploding my storage space, better safe than sorry ;-)
man btrfs states :
« NOTE: defragmenting with kernels up to 2.6.37 will unlink
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 16:46 +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Hi again,
Having numerous snapshots, I prefer to ask rather than take the risk of
exploding my storage space, better safe than sorry ;-)
man btrfs states :
« NOTE: defragmenting with kernels up to 2.6.37 will unlink COW-ed
Le 21/02/2013 16:50, Liu Bo a écrit :
Well, there is already a patch which addresses your concern and it's
'snapshot-aware defrag' feature and now in v6, it's not merged yet.
thanks, liubo
Hi Liu,
So should I understand that, even though the manpage states that the
issue is for kernels =
Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
Hi Calvin,
I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come with kernel 3.7 in April. Having Ubuntu
kernel upgrades every 6 months (and
On 02/21/2013 08:01 AM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
Hi Calvin,
I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come with kernel 3.7 in April.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:01:30PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 16:54, Calvin Walton a écrit :
You really should upgrade your kernel, however. 3.5.0 is rather old in
btrfs-years! Lots of fixes have gone into newer kernels.
Hi Calvin,
I expect Ubuntu 13.04 to come with
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:03:17PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 17:38, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Plus, if something does go wrong with your FS, and you're running an
older kernel, you'll get limited amounts of sympathy, because quite a
lot of the problems people encounter with
Le 21/02/2013 17:38, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Plus, if something does go wrong with your FS, and you're running an
older kernel, you'll get limited amounts of sympathy, because quite a
lot of the problems people encounter with older kernels have already
been fixed in newer ones.
The matter, as
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
The matter is that BTRFS had many early adopters just because it is -
and
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:47:28PM +0100, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
The
On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
to keep up with the latest code. Hugo.
The matter is that BTRFS
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:47:28 +0100
Swâmi Petaramesh sw...@petaramesh.org wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong
recommendation to keep up with the latest code.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:58:16PM +0100, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
On 02/21/2013 10:56 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:58:16PM +0100, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
closer, but it's not quite
15 matches
Mail list logo
