Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-10 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:58:33PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:56:06AM -0600, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:40:11PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:36:45AM -0600, David Sterba wrote: according to assembly, owner is

Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-10 Thread Chris Samuel
On 08/10/2012 07:49 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Am I right that it is not in 3.5.1? I don't believe fixes can be considered for stable releases until they're in the mainline, so until Linus processes that last merge request from Chris it can't happen (and he's not done so yet). That

Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-10 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 06:49:10AM -0600, Chris Samuel wrote: On 08/10/2012 07:49 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Am I right that it is not in 3.5.1? I don't believe fixes can be considered for stable releases until they're in the mainline, so until Linus processes that last merge

BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, I was running btrfs fi balance start -dusage=5 -musage=5 -v / on 3.5.0, and soon these BUG happened. Then some fs syscalls started to block (in mutt, find, ...), and after a while the computer (remote) stopped responding by ssh. After rebooting, the balance continued fine. I attach

Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-08 Thread David Sterba
Hi, On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 06:18:19PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: I attach dmesg.txt, and the disasm of insert_inline_extent_backref. That disasm was a bit tricky; my objdump does not seem to understand the btrfs.ko. thanks, added a few bits to the picture [ 6095.255745]

Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-08 Thread Josef Bacik
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:36:45AM -0600, David Sterba wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 06:18:19PM +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: I attach dmesg.txt, and the disasm of insert_inline_extent_backref. That disasm was a bit tricky; my objdump does not seem to understand the

Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-08 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:40:11PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:36:45AM -0600, David Sterba wrote: according to assembly, owner is in R15, BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID is 256, so owner == 1 This is fixed already in btrfs-next. Thanks, Ok, thank you. Does it mean it

Re: BUG on 3.5.0

2012-08-08 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:56:06AM -0600, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:40:11PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:36:45AM -0600, David Sterba wrote: according to assembly, owner is in R15, BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID is 256, so owner == 1