On 06/15/2015 05:37 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
For almost any non-COW filesystem (ext4, XFS, JFS, etc.), 1% or 100MB
(whichever is larger) is generally a good buffer. On BTRFS, I would say
at least 5% or 1.5G (again, whichever is larger; and if performance is a
concern, go for at least
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:47:24PM +0200, Tovo Rabemanantsoa wrote:
Hi all,
By browsing this list's archive, I've found a thread initiated by
Charles Cazabon entitled: Oddly slow read performance with near-full
largish FS.
Actually, I'm living the same experience but with a not so large FS
Hi all,
By browsing this list's archive, I've found a thread initiated by
Charles Cazabon entitled: Oddly slow read performance with near-full
largish FS.
Actually, I'm living the same experience but with a not so large FS
(256GB on a SSD). Indeed, when I have less than 1GB of free space, the
Hi,
Thanks for you reply,
If I really understand, it's always a good idea to keep more than 1% of
free space. Right ?
Usually the rule of thumb is 10-20%.
Br, Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On 2015-06-15 10:44, Tovo Rabemanantsoa wrote:
On 06/15/2015 03:29 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:47:24PM +0200, Tovo Rabemanantsoa wrote:
Hi all,
By browsing this list's archive, I've found a thread initiated by
Charles Cazabon entitled: Oddly slow read performance with
On 06/15/2015 03:29 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:47:24PM +0200, Tovo Rabemanantsoa wrote:
Hi all,
By browsing this list's archive, I've found a thread initiated by
Charles Cazabon entitled: Oddly slow read performance with near-full
largish FS.
Actually, I'm living the
