Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-04 14:40:20 -0400:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, so I'm going to guess that your problem is really with either file
> >> layout or just us using more metadata pages than the others. The file
> >> layout part is
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Chris Mason's message of 2011-08-04 11:04:54 -0400:
>> Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-04 10:45:51 -0400:
>> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> > > Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011
Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-02 10:35:54 -0400:
> I'm running into a significant slowdown in Btrfs (> 10x slower than
> normal) that appears to be due to some issue between how Btrfs is
> allocating memory, and how the kernel is expecting Btrfs to allocate
> memory.
>
> The prob
I'm running into a significant slowdown in Btrfs (> 10x slower than
normal) that appears to be due to some issue between how Btrfs is
allocating memory, and how the kernel is expecting Btrfs to allocate
memory.
The problem does seem to be somewhat hardware specific. I can
reproduce on two of my c
