On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:09:38PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 14, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org wrote:
So, I had btrfs_pool1 that was trashed/lost as discussed here recently.
I did btrfs send btrfs_pool2/root_ro.date | btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs_pool1
Then
So, I had btrfs_pool1 that was trashed/lost as discussed here recently.
I did btrfs send btrfs_pool2/root_ro.date | btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs_pool1
Then btrfs subvolume snapshot root_ro.date root
Now, after I delete root_ro.date on btrfs_pool1, shouldn't root become a
parent subvolume?
Right
On May 14, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org wrote:
So, I had btrfs_pool1 that was trashed/lost as discussed here recently.
I did btrfs send btrfs_pool2/root_ro.date | btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs_pool1
Then btrfs subvolume snapshot root_ro.date root
Now, after I delete