Re: Clarification needed about libbtrfs & libbtrfsutil

2018-05-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 14 May 2018 at 21:22, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:40:19AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> Are both of these meant to be public libraries, installed on the user >> systems, and available in .so variant as well for 3rd party >> development and public dynamic linking? >>

Re: Clarification needed about libbtrfs & libbtrfsutil

2018-05-14 Thread Omar Sandoval
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:40:19AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Are both of these meant to be public libraries, installed on the user > systems, and available in .so variant as well for 3rd party > development and public dynamic linking? > > Or are these private internal libraries, which ar

Clarification needed about libbtrfs & libbtrfsutil

2018-05-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Are both of these meant to be public libraries, installed on the user systems, and available in .so variant as well for 3rd party development and public dynamic linking? Or are these private internal libraries, which are installed as public runtime only, simply to share code between the utils, but