On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 08:10:00PM +, Duncan wrote:
Marc MERLIN posted on Sun, 04 May 2014 22:50:29 -0700 as excerpted:
In the second FS:
Label: btrfs_pool1 uuid: [...]
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 442.17GiB
devid1 size 865.01GiB used 751.04GiB path [...]
The
On 2014/05/07 09:59 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
[snip]
Did I get this right?
I'm not sure I did, since it seems the bigger the -dusage number, the
more work balance has to do.
If I asked -dsuage=85, it would do all chunks that are more than 15%
full?
-dusage=85 balances all chunks that up to 85%
On Wed, 7 May 2014 04:30:30 -0700
Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org wrote:
-dusage=85 balances all chunks that up to 85% full. The higher the
number, the more work that needs to be done.
Aah, right. I see why it's more work. =20 only makes is process the
few chunks that are up to 20% full
Marc MERLIN posted on Sun, 04 May 2014 22:50:29 -0700 as excerpted:
In the second FS:
Label: btrfs_pool1 uuid: [...]
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 442.17GiB
devid1 size 865.01GiB used 751.04GiB path [...]
The difference is huge between 'Total used' and 'devid used'.
Is
On 05/05/14 07:50, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 06:11:28AM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
The per-device used amount refers to the amount of space that has
been allocated to chunks. That first one probably needs a balance.
Btrfs doesn't behave very well when available diskspace is so
More slides, more questions, sorry :)
(thanks for the other answers, I'm still going through them)
If I have:
gandalfthegreat:~# btrfs fi show
Label: 'btrfs_pool1' uuid: 873d526c-e911-4234-af1b-239889cd143d
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 214.44GB
devid1 size 231.02GB used
On 2014/05/05 02:54 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
More slides, more questions, sorry :)
(thanks for the other answers, I'm still going through them)
If I have:
gandalfthegreat:~# btrfs fi show
Label: 'btrfs_pool1' uuid: 873d526c-e911-4234-af1b-239889cd143d
Total devices 1 FS bytes used
