On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:50:20 +, Steven Schlansker wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion. I did not find a 3.18.5 presented in any
> form other than as a large number of *.patch files, so I went for
> 3.19-rc6 instead (which I verified has this commit)
3.18.5 is out now but it shouldn't matte
Hi Holger,
On Jan 29, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Holger Hoffstätte
wrote:
> [This mail was also posted to gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs.]
>
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:44:02 +, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> [..snip..]
>
>> The symptoms are an endlessly increasing stream of hung tasks and high
>
> Pl
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:44:02 +, Steven Schlansker wrote:
[..snip..]
> The symptoms are an endlessly increasing stream of hung tasks and high
Please try 3.18.5 (-rc1 is good) which contains the following fix:
"workqueue: fix subtle pool management issue which can stall whole
worker_pool"
s
[ Please CC me on responses, I am not subscribed to the list ]
Hello linux-btrfs,
I am running an cluster of Docker containers managed by Apache Mesos. Until
recently, we'd found btrfs to be the most reliable storage backend for Docker.
But now we are having troubles where large numbers of ou
