On 11/02/2017 04:26 PM, Martin Raiber wrote:
> On 02.11.2017 16:10 Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> On 11/02/2017 04:02 PM, Martin Raiber wrote:
>>> snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it
>>> help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath
>>>
On 02.11.2017 16:10 Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 04:02 PM, Martin Raiber wrote:
>> snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it
>> help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath
>> would have higher throughput with more simultaneous
Hi Martin,
On 11/02/2017 04:02 PM, Martin Raiber wrote:
>
> snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it
> help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath
> would have higher throughput with more simultaneous read/write requests.
Just curious:
*
On 2017-11-02 11:02, Martin Raiber wrote:
Hi,
snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it
help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath
would have higher throughput with more simultaneous read/write requests.
I think a bigger impact would be
Hi,
snapshot cleanup is a little slow in my case (50TB volume). Would it
help to have multiple btrfs-cleaner threads? The block layer underneath
would have higher throughput with more simultaneous read/write requests.
Regards,
Martin Raiber
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line