Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-31 Thread Andrea Gelmini
2011/5/30 Chris Mason : > Ok, so I think we're blowing past the end of the page we've kmap'd.  But > I don't think that can happen without something like the patch below > triggering: Quick update: after rm of ~10 GB of data, I rebooted with Linus' latest git tree, and it works (after some minutes

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-30 Thread Chris Mason
Excerpts from Andrea Gelmini's message of 2011-05-30 07:59:30 -0400: > 2011/5/30 Chris Mason : > > These are perfect, thank you.  We're failing to write out the inode > > cache.  Since you're on a 32 bit machine, I'm guessing that we failed to > > kmap something properly. > > Thanks a lot for deta

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-30 Thread Andrea Gelmini
2011/5/29 Chris Mason : > Thanks, could you please send in the photos of the oops when you get > chance. By the way, switching from 2.6.38.7 to 2.6.39, I have a lot of this messages: [ 140.297248] block group 1107296256 has an wrong amount of free space [ 140.848435] block group 8623489024 has a

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-30 Thread Andrea Gelmini
2011/5/30 Chris Mason : > These are perfect, thank you.  We're failing to write out the inode > cache.  Since you're on a 32 bit machine, I'm guessing that we failed to > kmap something properly. Thanks a lot for detailed info. I recompiled, and get this: gelma@dell:~$ gdb /lib/modules/3.0.0-rc1/k

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-30 Thread Chris Mason
Excerpts from Andrea Gelmini's message of 2011-05-30 06:13:47 -0400: > 2011/5/29 Chris Mason : > > Thanks, could you please send in the photos of the oops when you get > > chance. > > Well, I retested everything compiling with frame pointers, so: > a) partition is mounted with this flags: > defaul

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-30 Thread Andrea Gelmini
2011/5/29 Chris Mason : > Thanks, could you please send in the photos of the oops when you get > chance. Well, I retested everything compiling with frame pointers, so: a) partition is mounted with this flags: defaults,ssd,noacl,space_cache (at the beginning I also used compress); b) vanilla kernel

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-29 Thread Li Zefan
David Sterba wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 07:05:47PM +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote: >>Everything works good with stock Ubuntu 11.04 kernel (2.6.38), >> vanilla 2.6.38 and vanilla 2.6.39. >>If I use Linus' git tree, BTRFS ooops at mount. > > can you please attach the oops traces?

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-28 Thread David Sterba
Hi, On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 07:05:47PM +0200, Andrea Gelmini wrote: >Everything works good with stock Ubuntu 11.04 kernel (2.6.38), > vanilla 2.6.38 and vanilla 2.6.39. >If I use Linus' git tree, BTRFS ooops at mount. can you please attach the oops traces? >So I bisected using kernel

Re: Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-28 Thread Chris Mason
Excerpts from Andrea Gelmini's message of 2011-05-28 13:05:47 -0400: > Hi all, >and thanks a lot for your work. >Well, I'm using my home with BTRFS. It's a Ext4 converted to BTRFS > via btrfs-convert. >Everything works good with stock Ubuntu 11.04 kernel (2.6.38), > vanilla 2.6.38 and v

Problem with latest for-linus branch

2011-05-28 Thread Andrea Gelmini
Hi all, and thanks a lot for your work. Well, I'm using my home with BTRFS. It's a Ext4 converted to BTRFS via btrfs-convert. Everything works good with stock Ubuntu 11.04 kernel (2.6.38), vanilla 2.6.38 and vanilla 2.6.39. If I use Linus' git tree, BTRFS ooops at mount. So I bisecte