On 10/26/2009 05:14 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:08:48PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 10/22/2009 06:15 AM, Andi Drebes wrote:
I don't know what is the developer plan to fix that - apparently it's
not in the high-priority list (but it must be certainly in the priority
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:27:36AM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 10/26/2009 05:14 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 02:08:48PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 10/22/2009 06:15 AM, Andi Drebes wrote:
I don't know what is the developer plan to fix that - apparently it's
not in
On 10/22/2009 06:15 AM, Andi Drebes wrote:
I don't know what is the developer plan to fix that - apparently it's
not in the high-priority list (but it must be certainly in the priority
list, anyone who gets out of memory using btrfs will have some chances of
getting an oops [...]).
I'd really
I don't know what is the developer plan to fix that - apparently it's
not in the high-priority list (but it must be certainly in the priority
list, anyone who gets out of memory using btrfs will have some chances of
getting an oops [...]).
I'd really appreciate to see a TODO section somewhere
On Jueves 22 Octubre 2009 12:15:59 Andi Drebes escribió:
I'd really appreciate to see a TODO section somewhere in the wiki. [..]
There's one (needs updating):
http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Development_timeline
Also, http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas has some ideas.
Hi!
I recently posted a message that addresses the usage of BUG_ON for memory
shortages concerning btrfs_alloc_path() (see [1]):
...
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
BUG_ON(!path);
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, search_key, path, 0, 0);
...
It seems that
