Quoting Eric Sandeen (2013-08-17 23:50:51)
> On 8/17/13 10:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason
> > wrote:
> >> The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want
> >> to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits that I feel are
On 8/17/13 10:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want
>> to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits that I feel are
>> important enough for v1.0. I just have to cut it, t
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want
> to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits that I feel are
> important enough for v1.0. I just have to cut it, the distros and
> others are completely correct
Quoting Duncan (2013-08-17 01:02:45)
> Tom Gundersen posted on Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:19:19 +0800 as excerpted:
>
> > I package btrfs-progs for Arch Linux, and I'm wondering about its
> > current status.
> >
> > I have seen repeated talk of making regular releases, but so far we
> > haven't had a pr
Tom Gundersen posted on Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:19:19 +0800 as excerpted:
> I package btrfs-progs for Arch Linux, and I'm wondering about its
> current status.
>
> I have seen repeated talk of making regular releases, but so far we
> haven't had a proper release since v19 four years ago.
>
> Are we
Hi guys,
I package btrfs-progs for Arch Linux, and I'm wondering about its
current status.
I have seen repeated talk of making regular releases, but so far we
haven't had a proper release since v19 four years ago.
Are we to take from this that btrfs-progs is not suitable for
distribution yet, an
