On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>>
>> Now I don't know what snapshot that is, since it's just renamed to
>> some non-descriptive name like "root" which happens to, by
>> convention, always be the active root. This is the problem with using
>> user domain to store contextu
On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Michael Göhler wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> thanks for taking the time.
>
>>> The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
>>> mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount handler.
>> I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to be
On 2013-11-08 18:44, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
> wrote:
>>
>> Instead of using set-default, I am used to rename the subvolume.
>> I.E. I assume that the root filesystem is a subvolume always called
>> "__active". When I want to rollback, I rename
On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
wrote:
>
> Instead of using set-default, I am used to rename the subvolume.
> I.E. I assume that the root filesystem is a subvolume always called
> "__active".
> When I want to rollback, I rename "__active" in "__broken" (or
> remove it), then
Hi Chris
thanks for taking the time.
The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount
handler.
I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to be used behind the scenes
for the described purpose. Consider the fol
>On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Michael Göhler wrote:
>> The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount handler.
>
>I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to be used behind the scenes
> for the described purpose
Michael Göhler posted on Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:45:32 +0100 as excerpted:
> The use case for that is to set quotas for the child subvolumes.
Quite apart from the main thread subject, you're aware that there are
major bugs with btrfs quotas/qgroups ATM, right? I'd certainly be wary
of depending on
On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Michael Göhler wrote:
> The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
> mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount handler.
I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to be used behind the scenes for the
described purpose. C
Hi,
I'm a contributor of the Arch Linux package mkinitcpio-btrfs [1]. The
goal of this hook is to provide Btrfs rollback support for root
filesystems directly from initrd.
Technically we are using a subvolume to store the root filesystem. The
user can snapshot it entirely and boot from this