> By the way - how does FUSE ZFS work? Is it stable? Good performance?
> We're using ZFS natively on Solaris 10 now, perhaps moving the storage
> to opensolaris soon.
It's pretty stable; I wouldn't put anything on it that isn't backed
up, but I guess that holds for any other filesystem. The speed
On 22. aug.. 2009, at 17.34, tsuraan wrote:
We discussed using the top bits of the chunk type field field to
store a
number of redundant disks -- so instead of RAID5, RAID6, etc., we
end up
with a single 'RAID56' flag, and the amount of redundancy is stored
elsewhere.
Is there any sort of
> We discussed using the top bits of the chunk type field field to store a
> number of redundant disks -- so instead of RAID5, RAID6, etc., we end up
> with a single 'RAID56' flag, and the amount of redundancy is stored
> elsewhere.
Is there any sort of timeline for RAID5/6 support in btrfs? I
cu
We discussed using the top bits of the chunk type field field to store a
number of redundant disks -- so instead of RAID5, RAID6, etc., we end up
with a single 'RAID56' flag, and the amount of redundancy is stored
elsewhere.
This attempts it, but I hate it and don't really want to do it. The type
