Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-28 Thread Duncan
Jose Otero posted on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:30:56 +0200 as excerpted: > Duncan, you are right. I have 8 GB of RAM, and the most memory intensive > thing I'll be doing is a VM for Windows. Now I double boot, but rarely > go into Win, only to play some game occasionally. So, I think I'll be > better of

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > The other caveat that nobody seems to mention outside of specific cases is > that using suspend to disks exposes you to direct attack by anyone with the > ability to either physically access the system, or boot an alternative OS on >

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-28 Thread Duncan
Austin S. Hemmelgarn posted on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:35:59 -0400 as excerpted: > The other caveat that nobody seems to mention outside of specific cases > is that using suspend to disks exposes you to direct attack by anyone > with the ability to either physically access the system, or boot an > alt

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-28 Thread Jose Otero
Thanks a lot Duncan, Chris Murphy, James Johnston, and Austin. Thanks for the clear answer and the extra information to chew on. Duncan, you are right. I have 8 GB of RAM, and the most memory intensive thing I'll be doing is a VM for Windows. Now I double boot, but rarely go into Win, only to pla

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-28 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2016-03-27 20:56, Duncan wrote: But there's another option you didn't mention, that may be useful, depending on your exact need and usage of that swap: Split your swap space in half, say (roughly, you can make one slightly larger than the other to allow for the EFI on one device) 8 GiB on ea

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-28 Thread Duncan
James Johnston posted on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 05:26:56 + as excerpted: > For me, I use swap on an SSD, which is orders of magnitude faster than > HDD. > Swap can still be useful on an SSD and can really close the gap between > RAM speeds and swap speeds. (The original poster would do well to use

RE: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-27 Thread James Johnston
Sorry to interject here, but I think it's a bit overreaching to suggest that swap isn't generally useful any more as a general-purpose member of the memory hierarchy > Given that swap on spinning rust is slower than real > RAM by several orders of magnitude, it'll still be far slower than real

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Jose Otero wrote: > Hello, > > -- > I apologize beforehand if I'm asking a too basic question for the > mailing list, or if it has been already answered at nauseam. > -- > > I have two hdd (Wes

Re: Raid 0 setup doubt.

2016-03-27 Thread Duncan
Jose Otero posted on Sun, 27 Mar 2016 12:35:43 +0200 as excerpted: > Hello, > > -- > I apologize beforehand if I'm asking a too basic question for the > mailing list, or if it has been already answered at nauseam. > -- Actua