On 2016-05-26 18:12, Graham Cobb wrote:
On 19/05/16 02:33, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Graham Cobb wrote on 2016/05/18 14:29 +0100:
A while ago I had a "no space" problem (despite fi df, fi show and fi
usage all agreeing I had over 1TB free). But this email isn't about
that.
As part of fixing that
On 19/05/16 02:33, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Graham Cobb wrote on 2016/05/18 14:29 +0100:
>> A while ago I had a "no space" problem (despite fi df, fi show and fi
>> usage all agreeing I had over 1TB free). But this email isn't about
>> that.
>>
>> As part of fixing that problem, I tried to do a
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Graham Cobb
> Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2016 8:11 PM
> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [Not TLS] Re: Reducing impact of periodic btrfs
On 19/05/16 05:09, Duncan wrote:
> So to Graham, are these 1.5K snapshots all of the same subvolume, or
> split into snapshots of several subvolumes? If it's all of the same
> subvolume or of only 2-3 subvolumes, you still have some work to do in
> terms of getting down to recommended snapshot
Qu Wenruo posted on Thu, 19 May 2016 09:33:19 +0800 as excerpted:
> Graham Cobb wrote on 2016/05/18 14:29 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a 6TB btrfs filesystem I created last year (about 60% used). It
>> is my main data disk for my home server so it gets a lot of usage
>> (particularly mail). I do
Graham Cobb wrote on 2016/05/18 14:29 +0100:
Hi,
I have a 6TB btrfs filesystem I created last year (about 60% used). It
is my main data disk for my home server so it gets a lot of usage
(particularly mail). I do frequent snapshots (using btrbk) so I have a
lot of snapshots (about 1500 now,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Graham Cobb
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016 11:30 PM
> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Reducing impact of periodic btrfs balance
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a 6TB
