Hi, Please ignore this patch, I misunderstood the lock order.
thanks, -liubo On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:40:12PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > Here %path is set with ->leave_spinning=1, thus it'll hold the rwlock > after btrfs_search_slot(), however, when processing delayed items in > __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(), it goes to acquire node->mutex > which might sleep, that is, it may sleep under spin_lock. > > Given node->mutex is necessary to avoid race between async works, this > remove the ->leave_spining setting. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c > index 19e4ad2..a857a2f 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c > @@ -1331,7 +1331,6 @@ static void btrfs_async_run_delayed_root(struct > btrfs_work *work) > if (!delayed_node) > goto free_path; > > - path->leave_spinning = 1; > root = delayed_node->root; > > trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root); > -- > 2.9.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
