Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> It did not put mkfs.btrfs in /sbin. This did however, validate all the
>> error paths ;).
> Heh ;)
> Well, mixing & matching upstream installs from source w/ rpm-packaged
> binaries is usually asking for trouble.
> I don't think it's a bug, just bad administrative p
On 3/15/13 12:07 PM, Rich Johnston wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Thanks once more for the patch. Once I finally got the correct version of
> mkfs.btrfs this looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston
>
> Interesting that the default make install of btrfs-progs did not install over
> my btrfsprogs rpm.
This patch has been commited.
Thanks
--Rich
commit 99eb53da9c08148132cdf3cd401b248e6a0d96c5
Author: Eric Sandeen
Date: Wed Mar 13 16:01:00 2013 +
xfstests: enable test 032 (mkfs overwrite) for btrfs
Now that btrfs has an "-f" arg, we can test that it doesn't
improperly overw
Eric,
Thanks once more for the patch. Once I finally got the correct version
of mkfs.btrfs this looks good.
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston
Interesting that the default make install of btrfs-progs did not install
over my btrfsprogs rpm.
Was running SLES11 SP2 with btrfsprogs-0.19-5.31.1.x86_6
