On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:58:01PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> I think days_since_boot was a lot clearer than daycode. In any case,
> please make the comment and the code consistent.
Yeah, I was going back and forth between days since the epoch and days
since boot, but found it was more ef
On Tue, Nov 25 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> static int update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time, int flags)
> {
> + struct timespec uptime;
> + unsigned short daycode;
> int ret;
>
> if (inode->i_op->update_time) {
> @@ -1525,17 +1527,33 @@ static int update_
