On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:34:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:15:57 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:31:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On thu, 16 May 2013 11:36:46 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:48:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
The grab/put
On thu, 16 May 2013 14:15:52 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:34:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:15:57 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:31:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On thu, 16 May 2013 11:36:46 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at
Quoting Miao Xie (2013-05-16 03:22:37)
I must say that the patch itself looks harmless, the reason is not good
enough.
I don't agree with you.
It is perishing that The memory reclaim task is blocked for a long time. We
should avoid
this problem.
synchronize_rcu and friends can take a
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:22:37PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On thu, 16 May 2013 14:15:52 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:34:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:15:57 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:31:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On thu, 16 May
Quoting Liu Bo (2013-05-16 10:31:39)
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:54:17AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Quoting Miao Xie (2013-05-16 03:22:37)
I must say that the patch itself looks harmless, the reason is not good
enough.
I don't agree with you.
It is perishing that The memory
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:34:55AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Quoting Liu Bo (2013-05-16 10:31:39)
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:54:17AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Quoting Miao Xie (2013-05-16 03:22:37)
I must say that the patch itself looks harmless, the reason is not
good enough.
On thu, 16 May 2013 22:57:07 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:34:55AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Quoting Liu Bo (2013-05-16 10:31:39)
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:54:17AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Quoting Miao Xie (2013-05-16 03:22:37)
I must say that the patch itself looks
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:48:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
The grab/put funtions will be used in the next patch, which need grab
the root object and ensure it is not freed. We use reference counter
instead of the srcu lock is to aovid blocking the memory reclaim task,
which invokes
On thu, 16 May 2013 11:36:46 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:48:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
The grab/put funtions will be used in the next patch, which need grab
the root object and ensure it is not freed. We use reference counter
instead of the srcu lock is to aovid blocking
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:31:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On thu, 16 May 2013 11:36:46 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:48:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
The grab/put funtions will be used in the next patch, which need grab
the root object and ensure it is not freed. We use
On Thu, 16 May 2013 13:15:57 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:31:11PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On thu, 16 May 2013 11:36:46 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:48:20PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
The grab/put funtions will be used in the next patch, which need grab
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
