On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 08:50:38AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > correctly.
> >
> > Fixes: 564901eac7a4 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce print_dir_item_err()")
> > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov
> > ---
>
> Ping
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
On 23.03.2018 16:48, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> When checking the validity of a DIR_ITEM item the index variable
> is explicitly set to -1 so that the index check in find_inode_ref()
> is ignored. This is necessary due to possible name collisions in DIR_ITEMS
> (i.e multiple files with the same crc
On 03/23/2018 10:48 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
When checking the validity of a DIR_ITEM item the index variable
is explicitly set to -1 so that the index check in find_inode_ref()
is ignored. This is necessary due to possible name collisions in DIR_ITEMS
(i.e multiple files with the same crc32c
On 2018年03月23日 22:48, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> When checking the validity of a DIR_ITEM item the index variable
> is explicitly set to -1 so that the index check in find_inode_ref()
> is ignored. This is necessary due to possible name collisions in DIR_ITEMS
> (i.e multiple files with the same cr
