On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:49:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:25:55AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> > >> For this to have any effect, 'h' must be added to getopt_long(), see
> > >> attached patch 1.
> > >>
> > >>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:25:55AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> >> For this to have any effect, 'h' must be added to getopt_long(), see
> >> attached patch 1.
> >>
> >> However, this results in btrfsck -h and --help doing different things:
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:47:38PM +0200, Dieter Ries wrote:
>> For this to have any effect, 'h' must be added to getopt_long(), see
>> attached patch 1.
>>
>> However, this results in btrfsck -h and --help doing different things:
>>
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:47:38PM +0200, Dieter Ries wrote:
> For this to have any effect, 'h' must be added to getopt_long(), see
> attached patch 1.
>
> However, this results in btrfsck -h and --help doing different things:
>
> --help prints the usage message to stdout and exits with exit
Hi everybody,
Am 08.02.2013 01:36, schrieb Ian Kumlien:
> diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
> index 71e98de..8e4cce0 100644
> --- a/cmds-check.c
> +++ b/cmds-check.c
[...]
> @@ -3574,7 +3579,8 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> (unsigned long long)bytenr
On 02/12/2013 11:52 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:01:33PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 06:37 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:39 AM, David Sterba wrote:
+# For backward compatibility, 'btrfs' changes behavio
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:01:33PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 06:37 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:39 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> >> +# For backward compatibility, 'btrfs' changes behaviour to fsck if it's
> >> named 'btrfsck'
> >>
On 02/12/2013 06:37 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:39 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>> +# For backward compatibility, 'btrfs' changes behaviour to fsck if it's
>> named 'btrfsck'
>> +btrfsck: btrfs
>> + @echo "[CP] $@"
>> + $(Q)cp btrfs btrfsck
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:39 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> +# For backward compatibility, 'btrfs' changes behaviour to fsck if it's
> named 'btrfsck'
> +btrfsck: btrfs
> + @echo "[CP] $@"
> + $(Q)cp btrfs btrfsck
> +
I think the idea was that btrfsck becomes a link (either s
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:36:58AM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> -btrfsck: $(objects) btrfsck.o
> - @echo "[LD] $@"
> - $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o btrfsck btrfsck.o $(objects) $(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS)
> -
Do we want to get rid of the btrfsck binary completely? Using the term
'btrsfck' is commo
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 12:07:50AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:17:13PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> > > H Iam,
> > >
> > > On 02/08/2013 01:36 AM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > > This patch includes the
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:17:13PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> > H Iam,
> >
> > On 02/08/2013 01:36 AM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > This patch includes the functionality of btrfs, it's
> > > found as "btrfs check" however it makes
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> H Iam,
>
> On 02/08/2013 01:36 AM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > This patch includes the functionality of btrfs, it's
> > found as "btrfs check" however it makes the binary
> > behave differently depending on what it's run as.
> [...]
H Iam,
On 02/08/2013 01:36 AM, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> This patch includes the functionality of btrfs, it's
> found as "btrfs check" however it makes the binary
> behave differently depending on what it's run as.
[...]
>
> +static int cmd_dummy(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + return 0;
I thin
14 matches
Mail list logo
