On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 03:12:37PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> On 10.07.19 г. 15:02 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > On 2019/7/10 下午7:19, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >> nit: I wonder if it will make it a bit easier to reason about the code
> >> if that function is renamed to valid_cross_block_key_order an
On 10.07.19 г. 15:02 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/7/10 下午7:19, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
> [...]
>>> +static int check_cross_tree_key_order(struct extent_buffer *left,
>>> + struct extent_buffer *right)
>>> +{
>>> + struct btrfs_key left_last;
>>> +
On 2019/7/10 下午7:19, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
[...]
>> +static int check_cross_tree_key_order(struct extent_buffer *left,
>> + struct extent_buffer *right)
>> +{
>> +struct btrfs_key left_last;
>> +struct btrfs_key right_first;
>> +int level = btrfs
On 10.07.19 г. 11:02 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> With crafted image, btrfs can panic at btrfs_del_csums().
> kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3188!
> invalid opcode: [#1] SMP PTI
> CPU: 0 PID: 1156 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9
> RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+
