Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: don't update mtime on deduped inodes

2015-06-29 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:35:02PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:52:41AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 05:44:28PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:01:01PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > > > One issue users have reported is

Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: don't update mtime on deduped inodes

2015-06-29 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:52:41AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 05:44:28PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:01:01PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > > One issue users have reported is that dedupe changes mtime on files, > > > resulting in tools like rsyn

Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: don't update mtime on deduped inodes

2015-06-29 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 05:44:28PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:01:01PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > One issue users have reported is that dedupe changes mtime on files, > > resulting in tools like rsync thinking that their contents have changed when > > in fact the data

Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: don't update mtime on deduped inodes

2015-06-27 Thread Zygo Blaxell
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:01:01PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > One issue users have reported is that dedupe changes mtime on files, > resulting in tools like rsync thinking that their contents have changed when > in fact the data is exactly the same. Clone still wants an mtime change, so > we speci