On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:50 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:19:26AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
>> > the patch has been applied on top of current linus which contains patches
>> > from
>> > both pull requests (ed8f37370d83).
>>
>> I think it is because the caller didn't reserve en
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 09:19:26AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> > the patch has been applied on top of current linus which contains patches
> > from
> > both pull requests (ed8f37370d83).
>
> I think it is because the caller didn't reserve enough space.Could you try to
> apply the following patch? It
David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:07:42PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> I'm working on a patch to fix cross-volume cloning, worked for simple cases
>> like cloning a single file. When I cloned a full linux-2.6 tree there was a
>> immediate BUG_ON (after third cloned file) in btrfs_de
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:07:42 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> I'm working on a patch to fix cross-volume cloning, worked for simple cases
> like cloning a single file. When I cloned a full linux-2.6 tree there was a
> immediate BUG_ON (after third cloned file) in btrfs_delayed_update_inode
> with -ENOSP
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:07:42PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> I'm working on a patch to fix cross-volume cloning, worked for simple cases
> like cloning a single file. When I cloned a full linux-2.6 tree there was a
> immediate BUG_ON (after third cloned file) in btrfs_delayed_update_inode
> with
